Selected work

Evidence-grounded agent systems

The work moves from measured decisions to model structure, agent behavior, constraint checks, and consequences in a coupled environment.

Selected work

From a problem to inspectable evidence

A plausible AI decision is not necessarily a realistic or valid one. I compare it with human evidence, check its limits, and trace what happens next.

People and their environment

Human surveys inform behavioral models; simulated households make adaptation choices under flood and resource constraints.

Evidence

Evidence-linked scientific work

AI research agents handle literature and tasks. I build tools that make sources, validation checks, and workflow state inspectable.

Evidence

Human respondents provide evidence. Simulated household agents and AI research agents are models and software, not people. These projects share a research approach, not one integrated published system.

01

Human-Grounded LLM Evaluation

Can AI-generated flood-insurance answers reflect how real households make decisions?How I approached it I compared real household surveys with profile-based LLM responses using measurement checks, decision-pathway analysis, and repeated runs.What it contributes A way to detect differences in household variation and decision relationships that average answers alone can hide.
Methods
Evaluation design · Psychometrics and SEM · Stability analysis
Boundaries
The interactive examples use synthetic records, not individual survey responses or research results.
View case study: Human-Grounded LLM Evaluation
02

FLOODABM

How do household choices change flood losses and the resources available next year?How I approached it I built the household decision model and connected adaptation choices to catastrophe, insurance, and financial mechanics.What it contributes A traceable link from household adaptation choices to losses, insurance outcomes, and resources in later years.
Methods
Agent-based modeling · Coupled simulation · Risk systems
Boundaries
Simulated household agents model adaptation; they are not an integrated LLM system.
View case study: FLOODABM
03

WAGF

What stops an invalid AI proposal from changing a simulation?How I approached it I designed the validation and repair path that checks an agent proposal before the simulation state can change.What it contributes An inspectable proposal-to-action boundary: invalid actions are blocked, repaired, and checked before execution.
Methods
Structured outputs · Constraint validation · Auditable repair
Boundaries
Demonstrations illustrate validation behavior, not a real-world safety guarantee.
View case study: WAGF

Open-source systems proof

Research infrastructure with inspectable failure behavior

Selected repositories support research operations, agent orchestration, and multilingual learning. Counts are refreshed through a reviewed build-time data workflow.

awesome-agentic-ai-zh

Maintained trilingual roadmap for agentic AI, with automated cross-language checks.

7.6K stars · 1K forks

awesome-agentic-ai-zh

ai-research-skills

Composable research workflow from gap discovery through study design and drafting.

384 stars · 23 forks

ai-research-skills

research-hub

Local-first Zotero, Obsidian, and NotebookLM workspace with provenance checks.

64 stars · 13 forks

research-hub

agent-collab-skills

Task splitting, reconciliation, debate, and acceptance gates for multi-agent work.

30 stars · 7 forks

agent-collab-skills

codex-delegate

Cross-platform delegation wrapper that verifies completion from repository state.

61 stars · 6 forks

codex-delegate

Updated: 2026-10-14 · Source: GitHub REST API snapshot

PDF

Documents

Choose the document for the context. The website keeps one identity; the PDFs change emphasis for the reader.

Contact

Build evaluations that connect model behavior to real evidence

Interested in evaluating AI decisions or building evidence-linked research systems? I welcome research and open-source collaboration, and Summer 2027 internship conversations.

More about my research path